Saturday, 30 June 2012

Rehabilitation for cancer


 Protection and usefulness of Laser Blood Rehabilitation for Cancer:


Anti-cancer drugs used in chemotherapy and the energy emitted by radiotherapy are regarded by critics as too overwhelming, considering that the immune system has been rendered weak by the progression of  blood cancer itself. Even a considerable number of patients choose not to undergo any of these mainstream approaches in their own terms, as they believe that chemotherapy and radiotherapy can only do more damage than cure.
There have been many alternative therapies introduced, and one such procedure is that concerning laser blood cancer Rehabilitation for Cancer therapy. In some institutions, it is also known as blood irradiation therapy or laser chemotherapy. Despite the difference in names, it works in the same process involving the exposure of blood to laser light. The main assumption is that laser provides therapeutic effects that will travel all throughout the body by way of the circulatory system or the bloodstream. Its primary claims include the improvement of blood flow, as well as how blood transport nutrients to vital organs. The immune system, white blood cells, and other substances necessary for resistance are said to be strengthened, especially when they are responsible for fighting foreign substances that cause diseases. For cancer treatment, laser is provided intravenously, or through the vein, in which the blood is illuminated by low laser levels.
Laser blood therapy was first introduced in Asia, specifically in China and Russia, where most studies about its effectiveness were conducted. However, such studies have not verified what types of cancer work best for this procedure, making it a very unlikely method to be accepted according to medical standards. The Russians were inspired by the use of laser blood therapy among astronauts who struggled with nutrition and digestion while on outer space, but many medical specialists have dismissed the use of the same method on cancer patients.
The effect of laser blood therapy on metastasis is quite unclear and questionable, as the exact process of how laser damages or kills cancer cells remain unconvincing. It would take more than laser light to stop cancer cells from proliferating, and more so in eliminating them. When used in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, the patient is subjected to the added stress of yet another invasive treatment. People react differently for every treatment, and it remains unclear if laser, at the very least, can work well to alleviate even just the adverse effects of chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation. Although any synergistic or antagonistic effects to chemotherapy and radiotherapy have yet to be documented, many medical experts still raise skeptical remarks about the overall safety of laser blood therapy. After all, safety is a primary criterion for any emerging medical procedure to be approved, and the patient's well-being before, during and after any procedure is always a top priority.
Nevertheless, there are studies that negate the therapeutic claims of laser blood therapy. According to a review published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, this procedure is of no use to cancer treatment, whether used alone or as adjunct to any other procedure. On a separate review spearheaded by the American Cancer Society, the said method was also verified as ineffective. Thus, any theoretical assumptions made by its advocates are questionable. The lack of positive results from grounded studies is also the reason why laser blood therapy has not garnered worldwide recognition for cancer management.
Laser blood therapy may yield promising results for cardiovascular disorders, but in cancer, its therapeutic effects may not be achievable just yet. Although it gives the impression that, being an alternative treatment, it is safer than most conventional procedures; many institutions simply do not uphold its use because of the lack of research concerning its effectiveness and safety. Whilst many people still argue that both chemotherapy and radiotherapy yield very unpleasant adverse effects and even some complications, such treatments remain to be the most commonly indicated medical approaches for all types of cancer as endorsed by medical standards. Despite the slight dangers associated with these conventional procedures, the benefits still outweigh the risks of such treatments.


2 comments: